अरविंद केजरीवाल आणि आम आदमी पार्टी--भाग १

>>सुप्रीम कोर्टाला काssही कळत नाही. काँग्रेसनियुक्त नायब राज्यपालांना फटकारायचं सोडून भाजपाच्या केंद्रसरकारला फटकारत बसलंय.

खरेतर येथे केंद्रसरकारला फटकारण्याचे काही कारण नाही. राज्यपाल आणि दिल्लीतल्या निवडून आलेल्या पक्षाच्या नेत्यांना फटकारणे योग्य झाले असते. (पक्ष = सर्व पक्ष कॉ.भा.आ.)

मिर्ची ताई २५०० किलो चंदनच्या बदल्यात विज असे म्हणतो आहे असे तुम्हाला वाटले काय?:(

भारताचे काही गुडविल जेस्चर असावे की नाही?

आमच्या आजोबांच्या काळात इंदोरमध्ये आमच्या मोहल्ल्यात एक माकड यायच आनी यायचं म्हणजे दर शुक्रवारीच यायच तर ते शुक्रवारीच येत की नाही बघायला आमच्याकडे लोक रजा टाकून बसायचे आणि तोबा गर्दी व्हायची त्याची आठवण झाली

चंदन बाहेर नेता येत नाही. Export prohibited. मग पंप्रना असे नियम नसतात का?

परत अज्ञान प्रदर्शन !!

चंदन देशाच्या बाहेरच काय राज्याच्या बाहेरही स्मगल करुन नेता येत नाही !! ऑफीशीयलीच न्यावे लागते,

याच धाग्यावर कोणीतरी असही सजेस्ट केल होत की २५०० ट्न चंदन देऊन तितकी जमीन मोकळी केली त आणी
कोणा एकाला विकली !! त्यावेळी मिर्ची यांनी दात दाखवले होते !!

सर्वात पहिली गोष्ट म्हणजे, पंप्र यांनी पशुपतीनाथ देवळाला "चंदन" नाही तर "रक्त-चंदन" भेट दिल आहे.

मिर्ची,

गानू आजींनी केजरीवाल यांच्याबद्दल दिलेल्या या मनोरंजक माहीतीविषयी आपलं काय मत आहे हो ?

November 1, 2000: Proceeds on two-year study leave; signs a bond saying he will work for three continuous years on return or pay up salary for non- working period

November 1, 2002: Rejoins work at Delhi income-tax office

2004: Proceeds on "leave without pay" on the ground that he was working on the RTI campaign

February 2006: Resigns from IRS; claims he worked for threeand-a-half years as against the mandatory three years

Claims he requested government in 2006 and 2007 to waive the bond condition because he was working on RTI, "a stated policy of government"

Claims did not hear from the government since 2007, a presumption of his resignation being accepted

Claims suddenly received a notice dated August 5 2011, 10 days before Anna Hazare was to launch his agitation, for paying Rs.9.28 crore to the government

And the loopholes...

- Leave-without-pay is availed when "permissible leaves" (casual leave, medical leave and earned leave) have been exhausted. It is usually granted in extraordinary circumstances when officer cannot attend work because of reasons such as a serious medical condition

- The three-year bond period cannot include leave without pay, that too for personal work like RTI campaign.

It would amount to a break in service

Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/i-t-slaps-notice-on-arvind-kejriwal-a...

अरेबापरे हा स्वतःच भ्रश्टाचारात बरबटलेला आहे असे दिसते यावरुन तरी

मी.मराठी | 5 August, 2014 - 07:11

अरेबापरे हा स्वतःच भ्रश्टाचारात बरबटलेला आहे असे दिसते यावरुन तरी

>>> याच्यावर काही उत्तर येण्याची अपेक्षा ठेवूच नका. आलाच तर सामना पिक्चरमधील "मारुती कांबळेचं काय झालं?" सारखाच वाड्राचं काय झालं असा प्रश्न येईल. माझं नाव पाहून त्यांना तेवढंच आठवतं बहुतेक. आधीच्या कित्येक प्रश्नांना आपण उत्तर दिलेले नाही हे आठवतच नाही.

मिर्ची,

याविषयीही जाणून घेण्यास आवडेल :-

On February 19, Neeraj Saxena and Anuj Kumar Agarwal, office bearers of Maulik Bharat Trust (engaged in voters’ awareness activities) accused Arvind Kejriwal of not mentioning many of his assets, and seriously undervaluing a property of his worth Rs 5.5 crore in the mandatory affidavit of assets and liabilities declaration that a candidate must submit to the Election Commission. Arvind Kejriwal had filed his nomination papers on November 16, 2013.

Agarwal is also editor of the Dialogue India magazine. It seems Arvind Kejriwal fudged his true address as well as the nature of his assets. He appears to have done so repeatedly and consciously, with an intention of deception, Agarwal says.

Ghaziabad land worth Rs 2.2 crore undervalued to Rs 5.5 lakh

Arvind Kejriwal stated in the affidavit on his assets the address of one of his properties as Plot No. 11/44 Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, admeasuring 2400 sq ft, and declared its approximate current market value as Rs 5.5 lakh only. This is an incomplete and undeliverable address.

The correct address of this property is Abhay Khand II, Indian Revenue Services Officer’s Co-operative Group Housing Society, Plot No 44, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. Its current market value is at least Rs 2.2 crores as the probable current market rate is Rs 1,00,000 per sq m for non-agricultural (residential) land in Indirapuram, Ghaziabad.

Even as per the more conservative Government rates announced vide notification dated July 31, 2013 of District Magistrate Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, Stamp Valuation of Property (Second Amendment) Rules, 2013, the valuation would be Rs 63,000 per sq m for Abhay Khand, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad.

Accordingly, the value of this property would be well over Rs 1.4 crore (222.96 sq m multiplied by Rs 63,000). Arvind Kejriwal did this, the petitioners complain, to keep his financial net worth under a figure of Rs 1 crore and conceal his actual net worth running into several crore rupees. Wilful concealment and suppression of the correct address and the value of the aforesaid property amounts to commission of a criminal offence under Section 125 A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 punishable with 6 months of imprisonment and/or fine or both.

Ghaziabad apartment not mentioned

Arvind Kejriwal failed to state the facts of being a beneficiary or owner of another property, which is situated at R 902, Girnar Apartments, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. A notice bearing number 631, for disconnection of the respondent’s electricity line (Book No 2014, Connection No 028342) dated June 27, 2013, was served in Arvind Kejriwal’s name. A copy of the notice was published on page 20 of the Dainik Jagran on 29 June 2013.

Arvind Kejriwal is a beneficiary of the property above, the details of which were also concealed and suppressed in his affidavit, the complainants allege. If the flat at Girnar Apartments is in the name of the defendant’s wife, even then declaring it to the Election Commission is mandatory.

Delhi address wrong

Arvind Kejriwal further mentioned a wrong residential address in his affidavit. He wrote it as 41 Bungalow, Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110001. The accused has never been a resident of this address. It was allegedly passed off as his residence to substantiate his domicile status as a citizen of Delhi for the purpose of contesting from the New Delhi constituency whereas he continued to reside in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, before and for days after the Delhi Assembly Elections 2013.

He has said he would vacate the plot allotted to him when his daughter’s school examination is over and that he would then return to Ghaziabad. This further establishes he is not a natural resident of Delhi. Declaring false residential address in the Form 6 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, is a punishable offence under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, punishable with one year imprisonment and/or fine or with both.

Properties mentioned in his trust’s deed omitted from affidavit

Kejriwal formed a trust as its “settler” on 19 December 2006 vide trust deed bearing number 14265 in the name of Public Cause Research Foundation (PCRF), wherein he gave his residential address as 403 L, Girnar, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh.

He registered the said trust’s deed at another address: 5/7, basement, Sarvapriya Vihar, New Delhi-110022. Ownership of both these properties, the donations made to the trust and the total value of the properties were not declared in his affidavit.

Rs 25 lakh collected from 468 questionable donors.

In 2012, an auditor’s report of PCRF in Schedule 10 under the heading, “Notes on accounts,” clause number 4 reads:

“The trust has refunded Rs 25,44,074.00 to 468 persons due to lack of information of (the) donor(s)”.

Collection of donation from clearly unidentifiable donors as well as refund to them amount “a serious financial fraud”, Saxena and Agarwal allege.

The complainants also allege that the purpose of research for which the trust was formed was never accomplished, since the same was only used as a financial arm to collect funds on behalf of India Against Corruption. Subsequently, allege the complainants, the funds were used by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which was formed through a national convention on 24 November 2012.

Insurance policies, fixed deposits etc concealed

Kejriwal “concealed and suppressed” his, his wife’s and his children’s insurance policies, fixed deposits and other investments, which he ought to have been declared in his affidavit. “It is highly improbable for any prudent person not to invest in a Life Insurance Policy, Fixed Deposits or any futuristic investments for themselves, their spouse or their dependents”, the complaint by Saxena and Agarwal reads. They suspect the intention of the accused in not declaring such possible assets. They believe this was yet another attempt on the part of Kejriwal to keep his net worth below a certain level and “create an impression of an extremely austere personality”.

The complaint against Kejriwal was filed under Sections 125 A and 31 of Representation of People’s Act 1950, and Section 177 of Indian Penal Code, before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi. This, after the complaints of Saxena and Agarwal were acknowledged by Commissioner of Police, Delhi, and referred to the Joint Commissioner of Police/Central Range for further necessary action (reference numbers 2808/E-mail dated 19 February and 3505/E-mail dated 4 March).

Earlier, they had sought to file a PIL on the issue, but the Delhi High Court directed them to pursue it before the appropriate forum; hence the complaint before a magistrate. The court of Metropolitan Magistrate Swati Katiyar has accepted the case and started hearing the witnesses of the petitioner. The Patiala House court has also issued summons to other witnesses. The next date of hearing is 7 May. Maulik Bharat is going to request the High Court to issue a directive to the trial court for daily hearing in accordance with the Supreme Court order of 10 March to trial courts that they must complete trials of criminal cases against MPs and MLAs within a year of charges framed.

While filing his nomination papers on 16 November 2013, Arvind was required to swear by an affidavit his true address(es) as well as the right valuation of all his moveable and immoveable assets, and also those of his spouse and dependants. The complaint filed by Saxena and Agarwal in the court is compelling enough to believe the head of the AAP is not as honest as he pitches himself as while addressing the electorate. Interestingly, the disclosures made by Kejriwal initially on his party’s official website had shown only two properties — one in Indirapuram and the other in Gurgaon — which was even less than what he swore by in his affidavit to the Election Commission.

शॉकिंग........व्हेरी करप्ट प्रॅक्टिसेस बाय केजरीवाल

या भानगडी मनीष सिसोदियांच्या....

NEW DELHI: Close on the heels of reports about law minister Somnath Bharti's alleged spamming days comes another embarrassment for the Aam Aadmi Party government that only a month ago was riding high on the promise of corruption-free governance.

This time, the party's second-in-command and chief minister Arvind Kejriwal's close aide, Manish Sisodia, is alleged to have diverted foreign funds meant for his NGO, Kabir, for personal use. Kejriwal is a governing body member of this NGO that works in the right to information (RTI) sphere.

The case is old and an inspection by the home ministry's controller of accounts in 2012 concluded: "In several cases, payments are not supported with relevant documents and are routed through Manish Sisodia in cash". The alleged irregularities include payment of rent to Sisodia's wife without receipts, unexplained travel expenses and even a "reimbursement" to Sisodia for servicing his car.

Kabir paid Rs 17.7 lakh to RTI activists throughout the country from 2008 to 2011-2012 but their agreements with it were not shown to the team. It also could not provide the inspection party any documentary evidence for salary and allowances paid to employees.

The NGO had received more than Rs 2 crore in foreign contributions between 2005-06 and 2010-11 and the inspection was done in accordance with the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, covering the period from 2005-06 to 2011-12. Sisodia, talking to TOI, said they have been cleared by the court in this matter and it has been raked up to politically target him.

Sisodia, the inspection report states, ran the NGO from his residence in Pandav Nagar and his wife Seema was paid Rs 12,000 per month as rent for it but no rent receipt was made available. Kabir's rent agreement with her was not shown to the team. The NGO's cash books from 2006 to 2008 were missing and Sisodia told the team they had been lost while relocating the office.

The report states Sisodia was paid Rs 17,900 on July 11, 2008 for a trip to Dehradun but the bill shows vehicles were hired for a six-day Delhi-Bahraich-Delhi tour. Also, the purpose of the tour, number of travellers and the list of toll paid are not mentioned. "Prima facie, it seems an example of embezzlement," says the report.

Sisodia was paid Rs 6,656 on November 23, 2008 for a Delhi-Lucknow-Delhi tour but his co-travellers, Divya Jyoti and Bibhav Kumar, are not on Kabir's board. He was paid Rs 2,496 on April 23, 2008 for a visit to Chitrakoot but it is not clear whether the tour was official.

Sisodia "reimbursed" Rs 3,900 on August 11, 2008 for servicing his Alto car. "This again is an evidence of embezzlement of foreign grants for personal use," the report says.

आईग्ग यान्नी तर आता आम आदमी भ्रष्टाचार पार्टी अस्च नाव ठेवाव पक्षाचे

मिर्चीताई - तुम्हाला दिल्लीच्या निवडणुकीचे इतके काय पडले आहे. नाही झाली अजुन ६ महीने निवडणुक तर काय अडतय? राज्य कारभार चालूच आहे ना.

माझ्या अनुभवाप्रमाणे जेंव्हा निवडुन आलेल्या सरकार ऐवजी कमिशनर किंवा कलेक्टर कारभार करत असतो तेंव्हा कारभार बरा असतो.

तुम्हाला सत्तेवर यायचे आहे म्हणुन ही आदळआपट चालु आहे. जनसेवा करायला निवडणुक कशाला पाहीजे. आत्ता कोणी हात धरुन अडवले आहे?

तुमचे विचार बाँग्रेसच्या आमदार-खासदारांशी जुळतात. त्यांनाही मोहल्ला सभा मंजूर नाहीत. लोक मात्र खूष आहेत. आता लोकशाहीत लोक खुष असावेत की लोकप्रतिनिधी हाच कळीचा मुद्दा आहे. >>>>

मोहल्ला सभा म्हणजे मूर्खपणा आहे. मी जर माझ्या पुण्यातल्या वॉर्ड मधे ५ कोटीचा निधी कसा वापरायचा ह्या बद्दल मोहल्ला सभा चालू आहे असे इमॅजिन केले तर माझ्या सारख्या सभ्य, टॅक्स भरणार्‍या, अतिक्रमण न करणार्‍या, कायद्याला घाबरणार्‍या लोकांच्या वाट्याला १ पैश्याचे विकासकाम येणार नाही.

हे प्रशांत भूषण यांचे प्रताप

NEW DELHI: The Aam Aadmi Party finds itself in yet another controversy as its leader Prashant Bhushan on Monday was indicted by the Himachal Pradesh government for misusing a land allotted to him by the state government, Times Now reports.

According to the report, the Supreme Court lawyer owns about 15 acres of land in Himachal Pradesh. The BJP government in 2010 had allowed him to buy a tea estate to open an educational institute at Kandwari near Palampur in Kangra district.

However, the current Congress government in the state charges that the land has been misused by the AAP leader.

Bhushan rubbished the allegations, saying the Congress is trying to target him for taking on the Himachal CM Virbhadra Singh.

The Congress, in the opposition in 2010, had accused the Prem Kumar Dhum al-led BJP government of violating statutory provisions in extending favours to Bhushan and enabling them to purchase land.

According to the state's laws, land-use of a tea garden cannot be changed.

It was alleged that the land, worth several crores of rupees in Palampur in Kangra district, was given to an educational society, comprising members of the Bhushan family, for just a few lakh rupees.

Bhushan is not new to controversies. Earlier, he had said that a referendum should be carried out in Kashmir on whether or not the Indian Army should be deployed in the Valley to deal with the security situation there.

The remark sparked a huge political row. However, AAP leaders distanced themselves from his views.

Kejriwal later said that he did not agree with Bhushan's views. (With inputs from agencies)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKFj0er9nOY

तुमचे विचार बाँग्रेसच्या आमदार-खासदारांशी जुळतात. त्यांनाही मोहल्ला सभा मंजूर नाहीत. लोक मात्र खूष आहेत. आता लोकशाहीत लोक खुष असावेत की लोकप्रतिनिधी हाच कळीचा मुद्दा आहे. >>>>

कोणी खुष असायचे हा प्रश्न नाहीये. जे बरोबर होयला पाहीजे ते होणे महत्वाचे आहे.
आकडे टाकुन वीज चोरणारे, पार्किंग मधे हॉटेल चालवणारे, वीज वापरुन नंतर वीज बील फाडणारे लोक, रस्ता आडवुन दुकान टाकणारे जर ठरवणार असतील की सरकार चा पैसे कसा वापरला जावा तर कठीण आहे.

मिर्ची ताई हा भारत आहे. इथली लोक जर लोकशाहीच्या लायकीची असती तर गेली ६५ वर्षे असले चोर आमदार, खासदार का निवडुन आले?

मिर्चीतै ईथुन पळून गेल्यात, त्या ईथल्या प्रश्नांना घाबरुन !!

मोदी सरकार च्या धाग्यावर भेटतील !!

मोदीं विरुद्ध पिंका टाकल्या म्हणजे केजरीवालबाबत कोणीही विचारणार नाही अस त्यांना वाटतय !!

भ्रष्टाचाराशी लढण्याची सुरुवात स्वता:पासुन करावी अस केजरीवाल यांना कधी वाटणार ?

स्पार्टाकस, ये क्या कर रहे हो? बच्ची (मिर्ची) कि जान लोगे क्या?

राज,

अजून काय झालं आहे हो? अद्याप अंजली दमानिया, शांती भूषण, मयांक गांधी शिल्लक आहेत.

मिर्चीनी आपचे दाखवायचे दात तेवढे पाहिले आहेत, त्याना खायचे दात दाखवतो आहे.

हमाम में सब नंगे !!!

यावर आलीच तर काय प्रतिक्रिया येईल ते देखील सांगतो.

अंतर्गत लोकापालात कोणीही दोषी आढळलेला नाही.!!!

इथे अ‍ॅक्टिंगचं ऑस्कर द्यायला हवं खरं तर!
इतक्या आयड्या काढून स्वतःशीच बोलायचं पुनःपुन्हा, अन तेही ट्र्याक ठेवल्यागत, म्हणजे खरंच कठीण काम आहे.
तेव्हा घ्या आमच्याकडून:

इब्लिस,
तुम्हाला उत्तर देण्याची मला गरज वाटत नाही.

स्पार्टा,
यू हू?
ऑस्कर तुम्हाला नव्हे, जोशींना आहे. सॉरी टू बर्स्ट युअर बबल, बट यू डोंट डिझर्व इव्हन नॉमिनेशन. बेटर लक नेक्ष्ट टाईम.

अंतर्गत लोकापालात कोणीही दोषी आढळलेला नाही.!!!

:G:-G:खोखो:
:G:-G:खोखो:

स्पार्टा,
यू हू?
ऑस्कर तुम्हाला नव्हे, जोशींना आहे. सॉरी टू बर्स्ट युअर बबल, बट यू डोंट डिझर्व इव्हन नॉमिनेशन. बेटर लक नेक्ष्ट टाईम. >>>

इब्लिस,
मी पुरस्काराचं नाव कधी काढलं? अजून माझ्यावर जोशी किंवा इतर कोणाचा आयडी असल्याचा आरोप तुमच्या कंपू़कडून झाला नाही याचं नवलंच वाटलं मला.

तुम्हाला दमडीचीही किंमत मी देत नाही. इग्नोर!

विपु वाचा. इथे नको. 'ते' रागावतील.

इब्लीस,
तुम्हाला इग्नोर याचा अर्थ कळतो ना?

फालतू विपू वाचायला मला वेळ नाही. आणि तुमची वाचायला तर वेळ आणि इच्छाही नाही.